Score: 9

"Good Flash"

submission: Gray and White Rocket.

date: May 14, 2006

But you did compact your audio didn't you? That's why it went by so fast.

Score: 9

"It was awesome"

submission: Sanctuary

date: May 7, 2006

but WTF?! i was reading the other reviews and they were all saying "deep" and stuff and I have no idea what this flash is about! I mean i get the war, and the skeleton stairs, but the angel thing being him?! and the fetus in the earth?! and the eye in the tree?! WTF?!!!

Score: 6

"Sorry,"

submission: SUPER DUPER NINJA ACTION!

date: March 26, 2005

but that was the most cliched movie i have ever had the misfortune to watch. Lost brother? Feet take me where my destiny lies? I have to destroy my past? I won't kill for money or work for those guys again? COME ON. That was positively HORRIBLE! The action wasn't bad... my violence mark was so high not because of the QUALITY of the violence but the QUANTITY. the graphics were OK, considering it was a confusing mass of cornily appearing weapons and too much stressing on "ancient weapons". If the ninja could've killed the guy from that distance, obviously, he wouldn't stick around to have a nice chat between guns and swords, and simply kill the guy right then and there. The same with the military guy, he would've shot crazily instead of bothering to talk. The "plot" seems to be FORCED into the flash, and it is, actually, the most horrible plot I have seen. You should've gone with a "Bunnykill" kind of plot, where there isn't a plot, just killing stuff, which is nice, if the graphics are good. Don't try to cram a billion overused, stupid, worthless cliches into a already average flash. Other than the plot, which leaves you begging for holes in it, it is a flash worth a decent score.